by cmoon » Mon Aug 11, 2008 3:13 pm
I'm not denying it, rather, it is old news. It doesn't change the fact that good games are still being made, AND many retro-titles have coming out as well (most of which have been ignored.)
I can't change the view of the companies which own the consoles, but I'll fall back to an old adage: I play video games, not consoles.
I realize the 'wall-o-text' posts were pretty much impenetrable, but if you could give 'em a shot--especially some of the links to outstanding recent titles--it might help this discussion actually be a discussion.
From my point of view this is what I've seen so far:
Initial argument: Video gaming died with the DC
Counter argument: No, it didn't. The PS2 has dozens of great titles, many of which are retro-oriented toward the old school gamer. The sheer number of good games may outstrip the 'classic' consoles.
Rebuttal (Kevin): I don't know about that because I haven't played those games, but Sony and Xbox have anti-2D policies. New games don't have any heart or soul.
Rebuttal from me: Games are developed and distributed based on sales. Jaded old-school gamers aren't supporting the developers who are sticking out their necks to make old-school games available (how many of you purchased Gradius 5, Raiden 3, Red Star, Blast Works, Castle of Shishigami(sp?) 2 or 3, King of Fighters 11, Various Atlus outings (RPGs, Fighters, etc.), etc., etc., etc.?????)
(Whatever comes after reBUTTal): I haven't played those games but the new consoles have an anti-2D stance, so....
?????????????
I guess I'll be the one person supporting all the new, old-skool titles, while you guys play emulations and complain about how bad gaming is. Sorry, your loss.
"I'm in my own head now, and it's where I should be" --Snitter