Tezuka In English Discussion Forums

This reminds me of a National Lampoon article some 30 years ago, claiming that 1+1≠2.

That reminds me of another article, this one was about W. E. Coyote losing his lawsuit against ACME CO on the grounds that every product bears a disclaimer stating its ineffectualness if used against Road Runners.

ummm jeffbert, I'm being dead serious.

Numbers being divisible by 0 is what has f'ed up quantum physicist theories. If they adopted this method they will be able to solve for einsteins static universe.

edit: I did explain it in a funny way but I am serious.

Very philosophical Kevin. And it makes sense too.

Like if I say when asked what I'd like for breakfast and I say nothing but cereal and toast. Well that is a contradiction in terms because I've already said at the beginning that I want nothing for breakfast. But cereal and toast are by implication asked for in place of nothing. You may say it only means you want nothing except for cereal and toast. However it is like first wanting one thing and then another. Nothing means absolutely nothing. How can you have absolutely nothing for breakfast except for cereal and toast? Cereal is something. Not nothing. Toast is something. If you want something specific for breakfast you cannot logically say you want to have nothing but something of some sort can you? Why don't people just make sense and say what they want straight out?:lol: