by Amrith » Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:19 pm
It's more complex than "animated child porn".
"Animated child porn" is prohibited in Japan. It exists, but not in large stores, it's illegal activity practised in some rare little business in otaku's districts, often in doujinshi which are complicated to check. Make the distinction between panties and pornography, to begin.
There's a recent trend in anime and manga culture called "moe". This very discussed tendency is scrambling the lines and sometimes it's difficult to clearly distinguish moe, as an artistic style essentially focused on little girls esthetics, and "animated child erotism". A female mangaka has denounced moe a few months ago, claiming its possible dangerosity, but she had been vilified by otaku's community. There is ambiguity since the beautiful women of Leiji Matsumoto or Buichi Terasawa have partially disappeared in the market and female characters have become younger. But ambiguity is tolerated, see Lewis Carrol and his strange novels and pictures. Ambiguity is not yet "child", "porn", and "child porn", even if there are problems. If I remember correctly, the UNESCO organisation explained three years ago that there were numerous pedophile's website in Japan, more than in other countries, due to legislative holes. And if I remember correctly one more time, since that day japanese government has voted a law which allowed progress in this field. That's true there are specific problems in Japan, which takes time to be completely resolved, like everywhere, but you can't simply say "Japan sells animated child porn" as if it was a banality, something that you see everyday in the street when you're living in Japan.
"They" told you lies or infinite extrapolations.
If "They" are existing of course...